Monday, April 20, 2009

Nostalgia Machine

I'm nostalgic for conversations I had yesterday. I've begun reminiscing events before they even occur. I'm reminiscing this right now. I can't go to the bar because I've already looked back on it in my memory... and I didn't have a good time.
-Kicking and Screaming


Americans are obsessed with the past. Let me qualify that statement. We're not obsessed so much with history, but with cultural aspects of the extremely recent past. I'm hesitant to make such a sweeping generalization, but no matter where you look you can see some form of entertainment set, for no reasons other than nostalgia, ten to twenty years ago. Whether it's 80's day during school spirit week, some crappy VH1 show where third rate comedians discuss cultural relics from the years gone by, or a "Punk Goes 90's" compilation CD, at times it seems like we want to move backwards in time, not forwards.

Those who point this out (and by "those" I mean the Chuck Klosterman article I read which talked about this) often point to a number of forums that illustrate this phenomenom. Whether it's television shows like "The Wonder Years," "Freaks and Geeks," and “I Love the 80's"-like shows, films such as Napoleon Dynamite, Donnie Darko, and The Wedding Singer, or new music that deliberately tries to sound like old music (The Killers, Shiny Toy Guns, etc.), this stuff plays on an imagined, supposedly shared vision that we're all supposed to intrinsically identify with as part of our cultural heritage. It caters specifically to the apparent need people have to be nostalgic about the past. However, this kind of thing is marketed towards an impersonal, culture-specific past. A new phenomenon has sprung up that is doing something similar, yet operating on a far more personal level. In fact, it brings people's own pasts right onto their computer screen on a daily basis.

compare with:

Do you have a facebook?

Facebook is a form of instant nostalgia that can be accessed at any time. It is essentially a journal that documents your development via wall posts, photos, and a shit-load of applications. It allows you to view your own past as it is happening. What's more interesting, and creepier, is that anyone you happen to be friends with, or anyone within your network, has access to this information as well. Never before have we been able to reminisce so vividly about events that took place just a few hours ago. Not only that, but the constant stream of new photos, applications, and groups lets us experience nostalgia for our friends (or complete strangers) just as easily. It's a fascinating, post-modern phenomenon.

I think that Facebook is one of the better innovations of the internet era. Its ability to connect people across the world is astounding. However, FB creates an unusual situation: it allows people who no longer have a "normal" or "traditional" relationship to have a quasi-real one that is ultimately unfullfilling for both parties.

Let me use an example to illustrate . It’s 1986. Boston native Bill decides to attend MIT. Freshmen year, he meets Amy from California. They fall in love at orientation and are inseparable thereafter. Until disaster strikes; Amy has been spending so much time with Bill that she's failed three of her classes and kicked out of school. They are both crushed, as their relationship is effectively over unless one of them decides to pull some romantic comedy-esque shenanigans. During the next year, they exchange phone calls or send letters on an increasingly irregular basis. By the end of college, the two have, for all practical purposes, forgotten about each other.

Push the clock ahead twenty-three years. It’s 2009. The same situation occurs, yet something is drastically different in terms of their relationship post-Amy’s move. The advent of Facebook allows them to get a constant reminder of what they’ve lost. They regularly check each other’s pages, send each other messages, look at new pictures.

You might think that this situation is actually preferable to the original one. After all, these two people were so close at one point in their lives; it must be a positive that they now have an easy way to stay in touch. It could be argued, though, that Facebook is making things much worse. Unless Bill attempts some harebrained, Lloyd Dobbler-like move to California, their relationship is over. Sometimes, the best thing to do to get over someone is just to forget about them. I'm not suggesting that either one should pull an Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind type procedure and literally erase all memory of each other. But in this kind of situation it's very possible that Bill and Amy should, in the words of Third Eye Blind frontman Stephan Jenkins, put the past away.

Facebook doesn’t allow for this though. When either Amy or Bill signs on it’s a virtual guarantee they’re checking out their former lover’s page. And this extends beyond the boyfriend/girlfriend paradigm. Say you used to be close with a group of people, but things fizzled out once college started. With Facebook, you can see your former best friends yucking it up without you on a daily basis. Or imagine an unrequited love interest from high school that you were friends with, but never had the balls to ask out. What about people who move to different states or countries? They are not allowed to forget about their prior life. Facebook is like the ghosts that visited Ebenezer Scrooge in a Christmas Carol, effortlessly taking us back to points in our life in an easy and often depressing way. It gives us a daily update of what we no longer have, or what we never had in the first place.

Friday, April 10, 2009

Clapping Man Thinks He's Some Kind of Hero

Get a load of this guy...


Nobody likes a braggart, and Mr. Kent "Toast" French is the epitome of a braggart. What makes it worse is that he's bragging about his ability to applaud. He's out there waving around some bullshit certificate like it's an Olympic medal. Give me a break, Toast. Being the fastest clapper in the world is nice, I guess. But how much of an accomplishment is it really? From what I've seen, the world of competitive clapping is a small one. Given a few weeks training time, I'm sure there are some pro baseball players who could out-clap the shit out of this fool. Also, he clearly hasn't been able to translate this into any discernible skill, unless you consider making terrible YouTube videos a skill. Next time I need to start a clap-gang, Toast will be the first guy I grab. Until then, keep clapping, friendo.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Final Four/Championship Game

I think it's safe to say that the Final Four and the championship game were a huge disappointment, at least from an entertainment perspective. The only drama in the last game was seeing how much UNC would win by.

-Kudos to the Tar Heels for putting the kibosh on a tough Michigan State team. Even though I hate them, especially Tyler "get me some tissues I'm crying again" Hansbrough, I have to admit they deserved it.

Not what I wanted to see...

-Danny Green is one of my most feared players in basketball. If I'm rooting against UNC, every time this guy so much as glances at the rim I get a little hot under the collar. I swear, I've seen him miss maybe 10 threes over the course of his career.

-The Villanova-UNC game brought up a debate I find myself having each time I watch a game where a team that normally makes threes is struggling. If you're Jay Wright,and your team can't make a shot, do you encourage the guys to keep shooting or do you try to figure out something else? There are solid arguments on both sides. On one hand, if you've advanced to the Final Four because of great shooting, it seems antithetical to go away from what has worked in the past. At the same time though, sometimes the shots you normally make just don't fall. I tend to side with the latter argument, depending on the situation. In that particular game, Nova would have given themselves a better chance if they started taking it to the bucket more. Lawson, Hansbrough, and Green were all in foul trouble. There comes a point in the game where you have to say, "We're not making threes. The seasons on the line. Let's try something different."

-Clark Kellog was atrocious throughout the tourney, especially in the Nova/UNC game (I missed the other game due to a tennis match). He seemed to be pulling phrases out of thin air. During one stretch, he referred to Ty Lawson's "rush hour handle." Umm, what? I'm guessing he's talking about the perturbing traffic situation and not the Jackie Chan/Chris Tucker series of films, but no one is sure at this point. During the same stretch, Kellog called Lawson a "high level custodian." I've conducted a number of informal polls and have scoured the internet, and no one has been able to explain to me how being a "high level custodian" is a positive characteristic of a basketball player. Also, in the championship game, he claimed that a player can't back up while boxing out. From my admittedly rudimentary understanding of the concept of boxing out, backing up is the prime component. Granted, my forays into boxing out are few and far between, so I could be dead wrong here.
-Bobby Frasor inexplicably pulled down an absurd amount of offensive rebounds in these two games. Actually, check that it's not inexplicable at all. The teams focus so much on keeping guys like Hansbrough and Deon Thompson that it's easy to forget about the squirrely little white guy.

-Good job by MSU to get to the title game, but what a poor showing in the championship. The Spartans turned the ball over on 21 of 89 possessions and were never in any position to win the game. I can't figure out if they just played that badly or if UNC is just much, much better.

-This year's One Shining Moment was sub-par. They showed the Scotty Reynolds shot against Pitt too early, for one thing. It also seemed like there was an excessive amount of Blake Griffin as well. To be fair, it's tough to work a Final Four that was essentially devoid of drama into a quality One Shining Moment.

Nothing could live up to the greatness of the 2002 One Shining Moment. I don't know why, but I love this one...


-I've had some horrible brackets before, but this year my level of incompetence reached an all time high. I'm in dead last in both of the brackets I had on Facebook, despite picking a completely different Final Four in each one. Ditto for the two brackets I actually put money on. Not one of my better efforts, but I feel confident about next year.

Anyway, I'm taking a break from writing about sports for a while, probably until the NBA playoffs start. Coming soon: a bunch of random shit and possibly a review of Watchmen if I get around to seeing it again. Speaking of film, very excited about Adventureland. I'm not going in hoping for the Citizen Kane of comedies, but for a spring release it looks solid. Ok, bye.